Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Informational Report Mandatory Draft

Introduction
Writing in the field of corporate finance is a lot more common than many people choose to acknowledge. It is the basis of all communication in the field. While there is a lot of face-to-face verbal communication in this field, concrete, writing is necessary to fully and accurately communicate information that can be easily referenced and utilized whenever necessary in the world of business. There are many formats of writing within the field, both academic and non-academic. These formats of writing encompass almost all forms of communication in the field of corporate finance.
Non-Academic Writing
 The writings in this field, at least in the non-academic sense, are always very concise, accurate and to the point. There is no room for error or unnecessary information in the field of corporate finance. Everything that should be revealed to the audience will be included, and any information unnecessary to the task at hand will be left out. This is the core principal to all writing in business, however, there are many different formats and types of writing that are used, such as memos, proposals, periodical reports, budgets, etc.
Memorandums, or memos as they are commonly referred to as, are short written messages commonly used in the business world sent from one employee to other employees. They are extremely versatile and general. They can cover any subject or topic and they are the basis of all formal and semiformal communications in corporate finance. While memos are generally rather broad in subject matter they can be very specific as well.
Proposals are used in corporate finance to present a new thought or idea to members of the department. They are rather specific, formal and very official looking. A new idea can be submitted to other employees as a memo, if it is less formal and meant as a casual reminder. But if a message needs to be taken seriously and is meant to be an official idea for action to be taken upon, it must be submitted as a proposal.
Periodical reports are formal statements submitted usually every quarter, month, or week. They are meant as a status report, showing the performance of the company since the past period. They are extremely formal in their structure and diction and usually have certain criteria covered in all periodical reports, such as earnings, losses, future goals, etc. They are only submitted after every specific period and are meant to report on the status of the company.
Budgets are pretty straight forward. A budget dictates where any and all funds used are going. They are usually submitted every quarter but may be monthly. Budgets usually contain explanations of where the funds therein are allocated and why they are being allocated to that project.
When writing any of these commonly used formats of communication in corporate finance, it is important to stick with the main concepts of the writing in the field. The writing in corporate finance is always clear, concise, always deals with hard, proven facts, and is never inaccurate. In a recent interview with Blake, a graduate student studying corporate finance at the University of Iowa, these concepts were very apparent. Blake said, “The writing is very concise, it only sticks to facts and necessary details. There’s no room for opinions in corporate finance. It’s imperative that the idea is presented quickly and clearly.” Clearly these concepts are central to the writing in corporate finance.
Writing is also the most common form of communication in corporate finance. Blake explains it perfectly, “Even when information is communicated in face-to-face discussions between employees, everyone asks for it to be sent in an email anyway. Talking is great, but at the end of the day, no one is going to be presenting ideas to others using information that was communicated verbally. Everyone wants written communications that they can reference and cite when necessary.” Nobody in the field corporate finance would go into a presentation without being sure that they have the correct information, and tangible evidence to support their claims.
Academic Writing
Academic writings are very different from the aforementioned non-academic writings. Academic writings in the field of corporate finance are very similar to academic writings in other disciplines within the business sector. These writings are professional and very informational, containing graphs, figures, formulas and advanced principles, not usually comprehensive to those outside the field. These articles are very complex and fast-paced in their stance.
Academic writings are formatted much different from non-academic writings in the field. The structure is very professional, often employing a two column format. The two column format will usually contain a narrative of information on the right side and citation, background information or a continuation of the narrative on the left. There is no title page on academic writings in corporate finance, but there is a centered title at the top of the first page. Below the title in a smaller font aligned to the left is the author, or authors, that wrote the piece and their credentials and affiliations. Following that is the abstract. An abstract is a short summary of the information featured in the piece and should contain all points discussed in the writing. Some authors may not utilize an abstract and may skip directly to the introduction, jumping straight into the piece instead of providing an overview for the reader. Abstracts are very useful to readers because instead of having to read a great deal of the piece to encounter much of the information contained in the writing, they can just read a short summary of the piece in the abstract. All academic corporate finance writings will be concluded with a list of the references used in the piece, still in two column format.
Conclusion
Writing in the field of corporate finance is very professional in content matter, stance, and diction. In the non-academic sense, ranging from most casual to most formal formats of writing, there are memos, proposals, periodical reports, and budgets. In the academic sense the writing is very strict in format and contains many complex formulas, graphs, and figures, all trying to argue a point, or points, stated in the abstract. Writing in both academic and non-academic senses must be clear, concise, accurate, and very formal.



Sources
Whittaker, C. (2002). The UK Financial Sector's Place in the Critical National Infrastructure. Information Security Technical Report, 7, 65-74. Retrieved September 15, 2015.

Hu, W., Lai, M., & Huang, H. (2009). Rating the relative efficiency of financial holding companies in an emerging economy: A multiple DEA approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 5592-5599. Retrieved September 15, 2015.

Alles, M., & Piechocki, M. (2012). Will XBRL improve corporate governance? International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 91-108. Retrieved September 15, 2015.


2 comments:

  1. I liked how professional Patrick's informal report appears. He informs the reader about the nature of writing in corporate finance almost immediately in the introduction. He lists many important aspects of the nature writing in this field. I feel as if the thesis statement could make more of a claim to lead the rest of the essay.

    I like that he sections off his paragraphs by using numerous titles throughout the essay. It makes his work very clear to the reader. He gives many examples and supports each of his claims thoroughly. In his essay, there is a lot more information about nonacademic writing than there is about academic writing. He could display that information more equally if he wanted to.

    Overall, the transitions and flow of the paper are very good. Some of the paragraph lengths vary a large amount which can be distracting, but it keeps the essay organized. This paper is both extremely informative and keeps the reader interested. He gives many examples and his studies show that he has a lot of knowledge about writing in corporate finance. All of his examples are quotes and introduced and explained accurately.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Overall, the paper was excellent. You did a great job elaborating on your sources and explaining the purpose in great detail. Your balance of sentence structure was good, so the paper flowed smoothly. I really liked how you split your information up using the different headings, as it also contributed to your paper flowing smoothly.
    If I had to change one thing about the paper, I would say that you possibly went into too much depth in the specific types of writing. I don’t think it was quite necessary to break down every single part of the academic writings that you were discussing. It is good to include that information, but I don’t think the intense elaboration was necessary. I think you could draw some of those details back and possibly discuss how those academic writings are used, who the intended audience of those writings are, etc.
    I also think that you went into a little too much detail in the non-academic writing section when you were describing all of the different types of writings that are used. It is very important to mention those in your paper, but if there’s any way you could condense the information at all and maybe combine some of the paragraphs so it’s not so drawn out it would benefit that section tremendously.
    When you were using your interview, it is important that you introduce who you interviewed by his full name (first and last) and refer to him by his last name only, not his first name. It will help the paper in general and the interview specifically to have a more formal feel to it. Also, the quotes that you used from the interview were very long. If there’s any way that you could leave some of it out and only use partial quotes, it would help that section feel less dry and give it more flow. I would also try and find a way to incorporate more of the quotes from the interview on a different subject within the paper; it will help the rest of the paper seem more viable if your interviewee can back up what you are saying.

    ReplyDelete